Intellectual Property Law

Does mend law rather than end law leave us stuck in a moral stone age of law vs law instead of grace & peace?

Many take pride in having law that makes it the right of all men to have life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Many also take pride in ammending such law to include women. Progress. But constant making and ammending of imperfect and corruptible laws never seems to make it all right. In fact, the more laws we create and ammend, the more confusion we seem to create among masses. If law imputes a crime(sin), the more law we create, the more criminals(sinners) we create thereby. Is being right to make others wrong all right? Or is it perhaps inexcusable and self condemning, as noted in Romans 2? Romans 2: thou art "inexcusable", O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou "condemnest thyself" The law Jesus imputed sin by, to make "sinners", seems to have also put an "accusation" over his head, crucifying him with indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish to the point he was heard saying he felt forsaken. What are your thoughts on law? Christ is the end of the law: Rom 10:4; Not the mend of law: Luke 5:36,37. The law is not of faith: Gal 3:11 No man is justified by law: Gal 3:12 If justified by law, then fallen from grace; And if fallen, Christ of no effect to you: Galatians 5:4

Public Comments

1. Have you ever seen any society work without law? No?
2. 'Mend law' is progressive; where as 'end law' is anarchic. Jesus said that Moses has given us law and he has amended it. But the Christians are suffering because they have not introduced changes when it were due. Muslims are not allowed to amend what Mohammad has given them 1400 years back. Therefore that will end, and no longer in a position to mend. Hinduism is ever mending, that is why they will survive eternally. Judaism will vanish with the withering of Jews numerically.